Exterminator Removed Hornet Nest From Queens Tree
A private contractor took down a large hornet nest in Middle Village after the NYC Parks Department declined the request.
Updated on Sept. 26, 2026 in Environmental

Live Poll
Should city agencies be responsible for removing hazardous insect nests on public property?
Exterminator Sean Cadenhead removed a bald-faced hornet nest hanging 10 feet above a sidewalk in Middle Village, Queens, on September 23, 2026. The NYC Parks Department had previously rejected requests to remove the nest, citing the insects' role in the ecosystem.
Why it matters
The incident highlights the tension between municipal urban management policies prioritizing biodiversity and resident concerns regarding proximity to stinging insects in public spaces. The Parks Department maintains that hornets serve a critical ecological function in the city.
The nest, estimated to house 400 bald-faced hornets, was located 10 feet above a sidewalk at Cowles Court and Dry Harbor Road. The structure occupied a volume roughly equivalent to two basketballs.
The players
Sean Cadenhead
A 41-year-old professional exterminator who performed the manual removal of the hornet nest.
NYC Parks Department
The municipal agency responsible for managing city trees and urban ecological policy.
The details
Cadenhead performed the removal by wearing specialized beekeeping protective gear to saturate the nest with pesticide. After the chemical application, he physically detached the nest from the city tree and contained it in a garbage bag for disposal.
Timeline
September 14, 2026: The NYC Parks Department emailed a refusal to remove the nest.
September 20, 2026: The New York Post reported on the nest.
September 23, 2026: Cadenhead removed the hornet nest.
The Tech Race
The removal challenges the NYC Parks Department's urban ecological preservation policy, which dictates how city infrastructure should coexist with local wildlife. The intervention underscores the increasing friction between municipal conservation mandates and the realities of public safety in dense urban neighborhoods.
Residents concerned about stinging insect nests in public trees should be aware that the city typically prioritizes ecological preservation over removal. Requests for intervention must align with departmental safety thresholds, which are rarely met based on ecosystem role alone.
The takeaway
This case illustrates the limits of municipal tolerance for stinging insects in residential corridors. Watch for updated city guidelines on nest removal protocols that may clarify when public hazard complaints take precedence over ecological preservation.
Further reading
For broader context on city wildlife management and ecological programs, see the Environmental section.
Live Poll
Should city agencies be responsible for removing hazardous insect nests on public property?






