Judge Denied Motion to Dismiss Apple Trade Secret Case
A federal court will proceed with litigation regarding the alleged theft of proprietary Apple Watch health-sensing data.
Updated on Oct. 1, 2026 in Consumer Electronics
Live Poll
Do you believe companies should be allowed to sue former employees to protect trade secrets?
U.S. District Judge Eumi Lee has denied a motion to dismiss Apple’s lawsuit against a former employee, Chen Shi, who is accused of stealing proprietary health-sensing technology. Apple alleges that Shi transferred sensitive documents to a USB drive before moving to competitor firms.
Why it matters
The case highlights the extreme competitive sensitivity of biometric hardware and software, where Apple has invested hundreds of millions of dollars. The outcome of the litigation could set a precedent for how intellectual property disputes involving R&D secrets are handled for wearable health technologies.
Apple alleges the misappropriated data included hardware and software specifications for temperature, heart rate, and blood oxygen sensors. The company claims it has invested hundreds of millions of dollars into the research and development of these specific Apple Watch features.
The players
Apple
A multinational technology company specializing in consumer electronics, software, and services, with significant R&D spending on wearable health-sensing hardware.
Chen Shi
A former employee at Apple accused of misappropriating internal research and development documents.
Eumi Lee
A U.S. District Judge presiding over the trade secret theft litigation in San Jose, California.
Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp.
A Chinese consumer electronics manufacturer that competes in the global smartphone and wearables market.
InnoPeak Technology, Inc.
A technology firm identified in the lawsuit as a recipient of the alleged proprietary disclosures.
The details
Apple contends that Chen Shi bypassed security measures by downloading 63 proprietary files from a protected Box folder. The company claims these files were then transferred to a USB drive one day before Shi left the firm. Apple alleges that Shi used this information to secure employment with Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp. and InnoPeak Technology, Inc., allegedly under the direction of Zijing Zeng.
Timeline
March 2026: A federal judge heard arguments regarding a preliminary injunction.
September 30, 2026: Judge Eumi Lee issued the ruling to deny the motion to dismiss the lawsuit.
The Tech Race
This case follows a pattern established by high-stakes technology theft trials where engineers move between competing firms. It reflects the intense pressure to gain a competitive edge in wearable health diagnostics, mirroring the aggressive legal tactics seen in the Waymo v. Uber litigation.
The litigation focuses on proprietary health-sensing features currently utilized in the Apple Watch lineup. While the case does not immediately impact the availability of these features for users, the outcome will determine the future competitive landscape for health-tracking innovation.
The takeaway
The court's decision ensures that the allegations regarding the theft of health-sensor R&D will proceed to full discovery. Stakeholders should monitor the court's upcoming ruling on Apple’s motion for a preliminary injunction as a signal of the case's immediate impact on the defendant's employment.
What happens next
The court is expected to rule on Apple's pending motion for a preliminary injunction.
Further reading
For broader trends in the wearable market, see our coverage in Consumer Electronics.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Court House News Service.
Live Poll
Do you believe companies should be allowed to sue former employees to protect trade secrets?
