The Shoestring Joined Copyright Lawsuit Against AI Giants

The local news outlet alleges that Microsoft and OpenAI used their reporting to train models without authorization.

Updated on Sept. 21, 2026 in Artificial Intelligence

Bold flat-color editorial illustration showing a singular classical stone pillar against a minimalist architectural facade, representing institutional legal conflict. — The Shoestring has filed a lawsuit against Microsoft and OpenAI, alleging that the technology companies utilized its published reporting to train artificial intelligence models without authorization. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Should AI companies be required to pay news publishers for using their content to train models?

The Shoestring has filed a lawsuit against Microsoft and OpenAI, alleging the companies used millions of words from its website to train large language models. The publication claims this unauthorized data usage generates AI digests that bypass their site, diminishing both traffic and potential reader contributions.

Why it matters

This legal challenge highlights the growing conflict between smaller, local news organizations and AI developers over the commercial value of training data. By seeking compensation and copyright protections, the plaintiffs are attempting to force a new economic model for content use in AI systems.

The Shoestring reports an average of 15,600 monthly page views and 10,600 visitors across its coverage of Franklin, Hampshire, and Hampden counties. The lawsuit alleges these metrics are eroded when AI-generated summaries replace direct reader engagement with their original articles.

The players

The Shoestring

An online-only news publication established in 2017 that covers Franklin, Hampshire, and Hampden counties.

Microsoft

A global technology company developing AI-integrated enterprise software, cloud infrastructure, and search tools.

OpenAI

A research organization and developer of large language models that power conversational AI and search applications.

Matthew J. Platkin

The attorney serving as legal counsel for the plaintiffs in this copyright infringement action.

The details

The complaint alleges that Microsoft and OpenAI scraped millions of words from publisher websites to train ChatGPT and Copilot, the AI-powered search and assistance tools. Plaintiffs claim that these systems produce digests that capture user interest without directing traffic back to the source material, thereby depriving outlets of revenue. OpenAI maintains that its use of such material constitutes fair use under copyright law.

September 14-20, 2026: The Shoestring filed the lawsuit against Microsoft and OpenAI.
June 2026: A separate coalition of 400 publishers filed a similar copyright lawsuit.
September 21, 2026: Microsoft provided a public statement regarding the ongoing litigation.

The Tech Race

This suit follows the legal trajectory established by the June 2026 copyright lawsuit filed by 400 publishers. It signals an expanding front of smaller, regional outlets challenging the training practices of major AI labs.

This litigation could force changes in how AI-driven search tools prioritize or display links to original news sources. Readers may notice shifts in how their preferred AI assistants attribute information as these court cases progress through the judiciary.

The takeaway

The case underscores a pivotal shift where local news outlets are moving to assert ownership over the data that fuels modern AI. Observers should track upcoming procedural rulings and whether Microsoft or OpenAI attempt to reach individual settlements with regional publishers.